Is Stanley Kubrick's 1980 horror classic The Shining really about the
holocaust? How does it figure in the genocide of the Native Americans?
Can it be used to prove that the moon landing was a hoax? It may sound
ridiculous that one fade-in shot of Jack Nicholson's hairline suggests
Hitler's mustache, but try telling that to a handful of hardcore
devotees who have dedicated the last 32 years to studying all 146
minutes of the beloved horror film frame by frame by frame. You may see
a simple-minded horror movie, they see a great deal more.
The Shining is one of those rare horror films that is loved even by
those who don't like the genre. Here was the story of an alcoholic
writer (Jack Nicholson) who takes a job as the winter caretaker at a
Colorado resort where he and his wife Wendy (Shelley Duvall) and son
Danny (Danny Lloyd) will be snowed in all winter while he tends the
boiler. The haunted history of the century-old hotel causes the dad to
go insane while the son uses his psychic abilities to call for help.
Simple, right? Some say, not so fast.
Rodney Asher's documentary Room 237 (named for the haunted hotel suite
in the film where three ax murders were committed) explores in
exhaustive – and sometimes laughable – details about the lengths that
five people have gone through to break the film down looking for clues,
signs, symbols and subtexts of every size and shape. Some of their
theories reside within the film, some have relevance to history. Others
are just plain wacko.
The five subjects are never seen on screen. We hear their voices and
they all share a commonality, they have seen something in The Shining
that the rest of us seem to miss. One of the interviewees points to a
wrecked truck, seen on screen for a few seconds, and suggests that it
was Kubrick thumbing his nose at writer Stephen King, who famously
hated the film. "I've wrecked your book," he suggests, "and here it is
for everyone to see." Another asks why Jack Nicholson's character is
seen at the beginning reading a Playgirl magazine – does he have
homoerotic feelings? Another interviewee traces the patterns of Danny's
Big Wheel rides through the hotel hallways – the path of one of his
treks is in the shape of a key. There is also the symbolism of the
large Calumet cans seen in the pantry at the film's opening. One of the
interviewees says that they are meant to suggest Native American ghosts
in the hotel. The real Calumet, Colorado, you see, is a legendary ghost
town.
Some of the information is interesting. One of the devotees suggests
that the hexagonal carpet pattern has something to say about Danny's
state of mind. Remember the scene where he is playing on the carpet and
a ball rolls into his space from out of nowhere? We see the shot from
overhead and the ball comes into the frame along the carpet pattern
that seems to lead right to Danny. In the next shot we see him
straight-on and the hexagonal pattern is closed. Was this a continuity
error, or was Kubrick trying to suggest something? What is he also
trying to suggest with a sticker on Danny's bathroom door that
disappears from shot to shot.
Other suggestions are just plain stupid. The silliest offers the idea
that Kubrick himself filmed the fake moon landing after the releasing
2001: A Space Odyssey in 1968 because the film proved that his special
effects team could do it convincingly. It is thought that The Shining
offers clues to a confession by Kubrick. Notice the rocket on Danny's
sweater.
In truth, if this were another filmmaker, the theories could be thrown
out with the trash, but Kubrick was such an eccentric, a man whose work
was a tapestry of maddening detail that we are forced to look at these
outlandish theories and wonder if he had them in mind from the start.
Did he mean for a skier in a poster to represent a Minotaur? From
another filmmaker probably not, but from Kubrick, who knows? What makes
Room 237 work is its obsessive detail. The interviewees have obviously
spent many days and nights searching each and every tiny frame looking
for some connection that suggests something more than just an
entertaining horror movie. For film buffs, this film may seem
invaluable. The effect of the film is that it offers so much unseen
detail that we may never have notice while watching the film, that it
makes us want to revisit the film and search for clues on our own. The
film is so full and so intricately detailed that there still seems to
be a lot of room left to explore. There are plenty of rooms that can be
explored . . . forever and ever and ever and ever.
That's the sad part about indiblogger - the good posts are always buried beneath a heap of self help crap. I didn't know that the shining was so multi layered and that King hated Kubrick's rendition. Will have to rewatch the movie and read the book more closely again.
ReplyDelete